The Future is Now: Weaving threads of an educational reimagining

The Future is Now: Weaving threads of an educational reimagining

At a moment when continuing ecological crises and social inequities converge and manifest themselves at nearly every turn as are more insistent calls for systemic reform, it is heartening to see the convergence of innovative practices in education as we recognise the role of learning in identifying, exploring, trialling and implementing powerful new initiatives for driving forward change. 

Recognising the limitations of current educational frameworks to meet the evolving demands of learners, human and more-than-human communities and our shared socio-ecological systems, there is an ever more urgent need to fundamentally reimagine and reshape an approach to education through a collaborative and regenerative approach. Following UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ plea for urgent collaborative action at COP28 — to ‘reject incrementalism. . . . One thing is for certain: “I win, you lose” is a recipe for collective failure‘, meaningful collective action is imperative.

Over the past two weeks, I was privileged to join conversations at several organisations and events, including the new International Centre for Sustainability and the Independent Higher Education (IHE) Annual Conference, both in London; at the Knowledge Cities World Summit (KCWS): Adapting to Climate-Change through Regenerative Transformation of Cities and Regions in Lindau, Germany; and at MOME, the Moholy-Nagy University of Art and Design, in Budapest.  Although distinctive in their missions and approaches, all four of these organisations are fully committed to testing and pushing innovation at the intersection of education, economics, technology, ecology, social justice, knowledge exchange, living-systems design, sustainability and regenerative practice. 

Central to my engagement was a focus on regenerative learning — particularly as a way of reimagining education in a non-linear and living-systems design framework. The panel I was invited to join at the IHE annual conference was titled ‘Building sustainable independent higher education’ and included co-panelists Kirsten Scott, Head of Research at Istituto Marangoni and Jess Neil, Chief Executive of the Stephen Lawrence Day Foundation. Our focus was multi-fold, from a broad overview of the possibilities of regenerative framing to examples of participatory organisational structures and collaborative initiatives linking social justice and socio-ecological sustainability to asking ‘How might the Earth want us to design?’ Throughout the session and in the conversations that followed, it was clear that although our stories were different, we shared a commitment to co-creating and cultivating a thriving learning ecosystem that empowers all participants — students, teachers, directors, trustees, communities and more-than-human stakeholders — to flourish together in an evolving regenerative paradigm. 

Building on the IHE event, KCWS brought together sessions on Educational Futures and the need to transform learning with shared my perspectives along with those of Keri Facer Professor of Educational and Social Futures at the University of Bristol; Chrissie Sorenson, Head of the Bavarian International School, Haimhausen; Cathy Garner, Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Lancaster; and Monika Schröttle, Political and Social Scientist at RWU. With threads of innovation from participatory student governance and decision-making to practice-led learning to decentralised university models, we again shared both our concerns for a wholesale transformation of higher education as well as compelling examples of what is already possible. For many of us, a key challenge is scaling this much-needed transformation so that innovation becomes foundational and sustainable for the long-term — all through an authentic process that draws from regenerative principles including:

  • Ecological Design and Living-Systems Thinking
  • Agency, Empowerment, Engagement 
  • Adaptability and Resilience
  • Restoration and Renewal
  • Social and Ecological Justice
  • Distributed and Decentralised Networks
  • Diversity and Cultural & Historical Contexts
  • Reflection, Regeneration and Continual Feedback
  • Interdependence, Integration and Interdisciplinarity
  • Co-creation and Collaboration
  • Adaptation
  • Community, Bio-regional and Global Perspectives
  • Practice, Action and Impact

These two wonderfully generative panels at IHE and KCWS were prefaced for me by a visit with Sachin Nandha, Director of the ICfS, where I serve as a Fellow, during which we explored the applications of regenerative thinking in educational systems in (and across) the UK and India and considered places and partnerships to effect transformational regenerative change at scale. I immediately recognised in our discussion an aligned desire to build profound cross-sector collaborations (my bias being that education undergirds everything else!), and I am very excited to begin collaborative work with the Centre’s other Fellows and researchers as we start to move forward. 

Finally, in my two days at MOME in Hungary, I met with several colleagues working at the forefront of European arts and design education who are already looking to a reimagined learning paradigm in arts, ecology and community from a bioregional perspective including deep cultural, agroecological and socio-ecological connections with the nearby Lake Balaton. The projects underway at MOME are themselves a significant leverage point at the transdisciplinary intersection of arts, ecology and democracy that are already beginning to move along an authentically regenerative pathway.  

As Halla Tómasdóttir recently said about the ongoing COP28 on Outrage and Optimism with Tom Rivett-Carnac, ‘we all know, and have been saying for a while, that the solutions are there. This is not a question of us not having solutions. We also know there is plenty of money in the system. The missing piece is courageous leadership from all of us’. For me, the events of the past two weeks illustrate just this: innovation is certainly prevalent — particularly in small and often fragile and unconnected initiatives — leveraging the power of co-creation is what can be the catalyst for substantive transformation.

The past fortnight has been for me a testament to the growing recognition of the need for a transformative shift in education at all levels. From London to Bavaria to Budapest, the common thread weaving through my conversations has been the urgency to reshape learning in a way that moves us beyond simply sustaining an inadequate status quo and toward an approach that reimagines learning as practice-led, community-focused and ecologically-centred — an intersection where I have spent much of the last 20 years of my professional career.

Being part of these conversations has further solidified my belief in the power of collaboration and collective action and the immense possibilities inherent not only in individual innovation but in weaving together these many approaches to craft a fabric fit for our next generations of learners: It is time for us to reimagine, realise and regenerate — together.

Regenerative Learning in Practice

Reposted here from The Regenerative Learning Network (RLN):

A few reflections from RLN Founder Pavel on some recent regenerative learning successes:

I was reflecting today on some more recent ways that I have found in my now 20 years in academic leadership to put into practice the ideas behind regenerative learning. Apart from these programmes, the of my academic career in the shape of things I had ‘made’ — always with the help, guidance and support of expert colleagues, students and other stakeholders.

Transformative Education — a Master’s programme at Schumacher College developed in 2022-23. Inspired by the College’s three decades of community-focused head, heart and hands pedagogy, this programme explores the interwoven fabric of place-based learning, global pedagogies, complexity and ecological thinking. Students will be ‘guided to frame, develop, and practice skills that can help shift both thinking and practice to make meaningful change in relationships between the human and more-than-human world through their own development of curriculum, programme design, and framing of learning experience’. 

Movement Mind and Ecology — a Master’s programme at Schumacher College established in 2020 and currently in its third year led by the exceptional team of RLN’s own Rachel Sweeney and Marie Hale. The programme’s focus on the intersection of ecological thinking, movement practice and environmental philosophy is a truly transdisciplinary engagement of how we can leverage our relationship with the more-than-human world through practice-led learning to facilitate authentic change in the world.

Local Leadership for Regenerative Food Systems — a programme begun in 2021 with the UNDP Conscious Food Systems Alliance (CoFSA). A truly globally distributed learning curriculum co-created from the ground-up with the help of a global Network of Local Hubs, to facilitate an equitable exchange of knowledge and experience for food systems practitioners of diverse backgrounds to develop the inner capacities needed to build regenerative and conscious food systems at grassroots level. The programme will be built of a series of dynamically interlinked modules offered both online and facilitated at site-based practice centres in locations around the world with plans to pilot the programme in 2024.

There are of course many more examples (and even more from my RLN colleagues!) — from regenerative agriculture programmes to integrating the management of learning and ecology in an organisational leadership framework to bioregion-based learning networks to implementing place-based and practice-led learning in hybrid and online settings — but as many of us struggle with what we can tangibly do and how we can best implement regenerative frameworks in our organisations, it’s helpful to reflect on what’s possible.

Relational and Receptive Network Ontologies: A Note on Learning Networks

Framing a learning network as relational (drawing on Bruno Latour) can radically open learning to the complex web of interdependencies that exist across teachers, students, institutions, ecosystems, cultures, experiences, and indeed all parts of a learning network. In the context of practice-led learning, such networks underscore that learning is a shared endeavour grounded in authentic relationship – often through community practice, service, or shared activity inclusive of a full diversity of stakeholders allowing learning to be a cooperative evolving process influenced by multiple actors. 

Receptive network ontologies further acknowledge the importance of openness to new ideas and different viewpoints in learning. The synergy between relational and receptive networks empowers learners to actively engage with a range of information sources and build their unique understanding. This shifts learners from passive recipients to active contributors and empowering them to explore, share, interrogate, and critically scrutinise information, practice, and experiences.

The combination of relational and receptive network ontologies offers a potent theoretical structure for understanding and promoting a reimagined learning paradigm that foregrounds relationship, receptivity co-creation and collaboration in an authentically distributed framework. Acknowledging learners’ interconnectedness and their openness to a diversity of knowledge and experience allows the co-creation of inclusive and participatory educational spaces.

Interweaving relational and receptive network ontologies emphasises learners, their agency, interconnectedness, and openness to diverse perspectives. By adopting this perspective, a de-institutionalised learning paradigm – such as a distributed network – can foster an environment that promotes active learning, collaboration, and critical engagement. Specifically, it can empower exploration in the following areas:

  • Distributed Agency: Agency would be distributed among all nodes – student, teacher,  human and more-than-human, treating each as a valid and capable participant. This could translate into a network where participants are not just passive receivers and providers of information, but active participants that engage and shape the network in unique ways. Beyond an emphasis on nodes, the receptivity of such a network would give equal agency to connections and relationships as to objects in relation. 
  • Collaborative Learning: A relational and distributed learning network would emphasize collaborative, experiential, and embodied learning. The network could facilitate interactive experiences, encourage peer-to-peer learning, and even integrate with physical or augmented reality environments to support embodied learning experiences.
  • Fluid and Dynamic Structures: Such a network would also have a fluid and dynamic structure, reflecting the constant flux and change of ecological complexity. Rather than being fixed and static, the network would continually adapt and evolve in response to the actions and interactions of its participants – human and more-than-human (from Aardvark to Albedo to AI)
  • Ethical and Inclusive Design: A key element braided together within an authentically de-institutionalised distributed network model is a foundation of ethical, inclusive, accessible and equitable design principles. The network would be designed to inclusively evolve, giving all nodes a voice in shaping network changes, and ensuring that adaptations don’t disadvantage certain groups. New identities that blend definitions of learner, teacher, and co-creator roles would be valued within the network and contribute to a diverse, vibrant learning ecosystem. Any accessible network would also engage in what EF Schumacher described as ‘appropriate technologies’, here in the context of minimal computing to empower ‘students to be their own arbiters of engagement’ (​​Lee Skallerup Bessette).
  • Development of new network identities: Finally, such a network (inspired as it is by the work of Karen Barad, Felix Guattari, Bruno Latour, Thomas Nail, Rosi Braidotti, Jussi Parikka and others) would necessarily break down barriers between node and relationship; between human and more-than-human; between learning and experience. A receptive relational network could yield an evolution in network identities, an ‘ecology of practices’ that  ‘opens up a world: a world of relations, abstractions, spaces that turn into movements … and it becomes an onto-epistemological framework’ (Parikka).

Inroads into the development of distributed and relational learning are not entirely uncommon; however, engaging with dynamic learning networks in the context of institutional frameworks can prove challenging. Nonetheless, there are huge opportunities for learning in innovative network ecologies if learning is to continue to develop as a meaningful way to engage in the global ecological and social challenges that increasingly come to define this century.

An Ecosemiotic Model for Learning

An Ecosemiotic Model for Learning: Designing experiential curriculum in a distributed globally learning network

Pavel Cenkl, Director of Learning at Dartington Trust & Head of Schumacher College

July 2021

This is a companion post for a poster presented at the 21st Annual Gatherings in Biosemiotics in Stockholm, Sweden, July 26-29, 2021

Please note this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

What could higher education look like if we understand and engage with our world as a complex, integrated socioecological system? 

This post outlines both theoretical framework and practical application of resilient learning networks in an ecologically-focused experiential higher education curriculum delivered in a hybrid online and site-based context. An ecosemiotic approach to curriculum design and delivery is introduced that situates humans as deeply enmeshed in a complex sympoietic network. 

This multi-scale learning network is always already in the process of co-becoming, manifesting a world in which organisms communicate always in an unfinished processual dynamic.

A globally distributed site-based experience can build a far more resilient learning network than existing site-based, online, or hybrid higher education allows. 

Our covid-influenced present and unpredictable future demand radical revision of higher education’s traditional forms of delivery. An ecosemiotic approach to scaffolding distributed site-based learning can help make a pathway toward a resilient, adaptive, and multi-scale curriculum.

For an outline of the distributed learning model, listen to my segment “Experiential Learning in the Digital Age” with Sophie Bailey on the Edtech Podcast

An ecosemiotic curriculum model includes:

    a) Development of new network identities and ecologies for interspecies collaboratory spaces

Experiential learning is grounded in interspecies collaboration through enactivist approaches to help learners explore their relationships with the more-than-human world through embodied practice, site-based experience, and participant reflection.

It is essential to support learner understanding and exploration of interweaving network identities — from online learning networks to socioecological networks to local and bioregional networks that underscore the complexity of a multi-sited, multi-temporal, multi-species, and transdisciplinary learning network. Such an understanding must be embedded in the context of programme structure, delivery, and class rhythms.

For more on ecological models for learning, see my 2017 SXSWedu presentation “Ecology as a Model for Teaching” and my SEAD (Sciences, Engineering, Arts, and Design) white paper, “A New Ecology of Learning: Ecological Systems as Pedagogical Models

    b) Framing learning in a distributed global learning network (DGLN) in the context of our situatedness within a complex socioecological system

A distributed global leaning network is based on ecological systems and affords learners active co-creative engagement with delivery, projects, and assessments. Attributes include: non-linear dynamics; unpredictability; sympoietic co-organisation.

A globally distributed model integrates a diverse range of site-based experience from different locations in the world and thus creates a rich, complex ecosystem of experience shared across students and engaged with across reflections and formative and summative assessments. In a master’s programme, the breadth of socio-ecological engagement can build a broader, more solid and ultimately more resilient foundation for a final project or dissertation.

    c) Deployment of learning clusters of colocated off-site students to enable face-to-face collaboration and experience when travel is not possible

On-site facilitation is key to support learners’ sensual engagement with more-than-human actors that are subsequently shared through both synchronous and asynchronous multi-media. Relationships with global partners able to support and facilitate student experience around the world is a key component to a successful and vibrant DGLN. Indeed, such a network fosters genuine collaborative two-way learning due to the unique nature of global site-based learning. The pedagogy and curricular frame are held online and enriched by a breadth of experience across the different participating sites in an approach that underscores decoloniality through the sharing and application of global ways of knowing and practice.

For example, in a postgraduate module on soil health (MSc Regenerative Farming, Food and Enterprise at Schumacher College), the course would frame theory and research methods whilst drawing on local knowledge, traditions, methods, and understanding of local socioecological networks in sites with very different climates, soil structures, and seasonality.

A good entry to work on ecology and decoloniality can be found at: “Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices
for a more ethical ecology
” by Christopher H. Trisos , Jess Auerbach, and Madhusudan Katti  in Nature Ecology & Evolution 24 May 2021

    d) Equitable site-based facilitation of experience-based learning for all students, whether on or off campus

A key challenge for hybrid learning is the ability to provide equitable experience for on and off-site learners. An adaptive and distributed curriculum must be grounded in facilitated site-based experience through a robust learning network.

Typical hybrid or hybrid-flexible learning blends synchronous and asynchronous online learning to support simultaneous learning for students both on-site and off-site. The learning in the majority of settings is centralised and focused on the delivery of information and assessment. In a distributed model, learning is the network (to echo George Siemens’ Connectivism: Learning as Network Creation (2004)), and relationships among students, teachers and the more-than-human world are the foundation for a process-based enactivist approach to collaborative experiential learning.

    e) Implementation of Next Generation Digital Learning Environments (NGDLEs) that integrate a self-organised set of tools to complement the use of a VLE or LMS. 

NGDLEs comprise a complexity model and empower learners to identify appropriate tools for connecting ecosomatic practice and ecosemiotic engagement. Tools must be simple, student-aligned, and alive. If the development of a suite of online tools adapts to the systems-approach to learning, they can be adapted from simple platforms already used by students and supported by a learning management system (principally only as a platform for delivering content). In a co-created learning network, the tools may evolve and vary based on need, accessibility (including government censorship and bandwidth access).

For more on NGDLEs, visit the research published at Educause by Malcolm Brown, Jeffery Pomerantz, and D. Christopher Broooks. “The NGDLE: We are the Architects” is a good place to start.

Ultimately, an ecosemiotic approach to learning can help build a more regenerative and resilient model for higher education. A regenerative approach continually enfolds, adapts, and participates in complex socio-ecological system dynamics through acts of interspecies listening, co-creation, and collaboration. Further, an understanding of multi-level and large-scale socioecological resilience factors can help learning programmes to build a resilient relationship between human and more-than-human participants.

These factors include (summarised from “How to conceptualize and operationalize resilience in socio-ecological systems?” by Marjolein Sterk, Ingrid A van de Leemput, and Edwin THM Peeters in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2017 (28)):

  • Maintaining diversity — among learners, tools, experiences, approaches, and means of access to learning
  • Establish and cultivating connectivity among network participants
  • Being receptive to feedbacks in an authentically regenerative model
  • Embracing complex thinking to enable new connections, new collaborations, and innovative ways of thinking that draw on a diversity of models — effectively leveraging a complex socioecological learning network to build new ways of knowing and practice.

Finally, a regenerative learning model — such as those developed at Schumacher College and Dartington Trust — grounded in an ecosemiotic approach that recognises the essential role that the development of place-based knowledge and practice through experience across diverse sites around the world is a key component of the future in the rapidly changing landscape of higher education.

For further information, contact Pavel at pavel.cenkl@dartington.org

Recent Podcasts

Over the past year, I have been invited to participate in a number of different podcasts and interviews — on topics from endurance running to resilience to global learning networks. Please see the list below and enjoy!

Experiential Learning in the Digital Age; interview with Sophie Bailey. The EdTech Podcast. 21 June 2021. https://theedtechpodcast.com/227-experiential-learning-in-the-digital-age/ 

More than Human, conversation with Trewin Restorick; interview by Amanda Carpenter.  The Planet Pod. 26 May 2021. https://theplanetpod.com/more-than-human/ 

Happy Teachers will Change the World: Educación Positiva. 19 May 2021 (Pavel from 1:31:45-1:44:10)

Schumacher College with Pavel Cenkl and Morag Gamble. Episode 39: Sense-Making in a Changing World. 29 April 2021.

Pavel Cenkl: Climate Run. Smart Athlete Podcast. Episode 57. 19 June 2020.

Running, ecology and landscapes. Wild Running: Trail Running and SwimRun Adventures. 19 June 2020.

Schumacher College: Education for ReGeneration. Conversation with Christian Wahl. 30 May 2020.